Reconstruction of riverine food webs in Kissimee River

 

Goal of research

The central focus of this research project was to quantify and compare diets of fishes collected in enhanced and unenhanced river sections in order to evaluate the feasibility of restoring trophic linkages between main channel and floodplain marshes of the highly altered Kissimmee River.


 

Key findings

  • Diets were reconstructed for 21 black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), 70 bowfin (Amia calva), 22 chain pickerel (Esox niger), 235 Florida gar (Lepisosteus platyrhincus), 258 largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and 46 warmouth (Lepomis gulosus) collected from enhanced and non-enhanced portions of the Kissimmee River.
  • Prey eaten by large, predatory fishes in the enhanced portion of the Kissimmee River were quantitatively and qualitatively different from prey eaten in non-enhanced portions of the river.
  • Predators in the enhanced portion of the river had fewer empty stomachs, more prey items per individual, more prey types per individual, more fish prey, greater overall diversity of prey, and a multivariate suite of prey distinct from predators in non-enhanced portions of the river.
  • Results from hydrologic manipulations suggest that large-scale restoration of hydrologic linkages between the main channel and floodplain habitats will positively affect food web structure and ecosystem function in the Kissimmee River.
  • Preliminary analyses suggested that amphibians and reptiles may be a significant portion of the diet of large, predatory fishes in the Kissimmee River. However, analysis of all of our samples indicated that amphibians and reptiles are not an important part of the piscine food web in the channelized Kissimmee River.
  • Eighty percent of fishes that preyed upon herpetofauna were collected from non-enhanced portions of the river, which may reflect lower abundance of preferred prey in these disturbed habitats.

 


 

Collaborators

  • Albrey Arrington

 

Sources of funding

  • South Florida Water Management District

 

Publications


 

Pictures

 

Predators ate a diversity of prey. This image shows gut contents from a single bowfin. This figure shows how multivariate profile of diet of fishes from enhanced pool (B) is distinct from diet of fishes in unenhanced pools (A, C).