Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Demographic Information
Gender N%
Female 109 51.17%
Male 95 44.60%
Prefer not to respond 9 4.23%
   Total213 100.00%
 No response2
 
Ethnicity/Race N%
African-American 13 6.07%
American Indian or Alaskan Native 1 0.47%
Asian or Pacific Islander 4 1.87%
Caucasian/White 162 75.70%
Hispanic 7 3.27%
Other race 3 1.40%
Race - Prefer not to respond 24 11.21%
   Total214 100.00%
 No response1
 
Employment N%
Full-time 205 95.35%
Part-time 9 4.19%
Temporary 1 0.47%
   Total215 100.00%
 No response0
 
Position N%
Faculty 94 43.72%
Administration 72 33.49%
Staff 49 22.79%
Board Member/trustee 0 0.00%
   Total215 100.00%
 No response0
 
Years Employed N%
Less than 1 year 26 12.15%
1-5 years 54 25.23%
6-10 years 39 18.22%
11-20 years 53 24.77%
More than 20 years 42 19.63%
   Total214 100.00%
 No response1
 
Tenure Status N%
Tenured 68 62.96%
Tenure-track 10 9.26%
Non-tenure track 19 17.59%
Other tenure status 11 10.19%
   Total108 100.00%
 No response107
 
Teaching Assignment N%
Undergraduate courses 60 59.41%
Graduate courses 7 6.93%
Both undergraduate and graduate courses 28 27.72%
Other teaching assignment 6 5.94%
   Total101 100.00%
 No response114
 
Rank N%
Professor 32 32.65%
Associate professor 37 37.76%
Assistant professor 12 12.24%
Instructor/lecturer 12 12.24%
Adjunct 5 5.10%
   Total98 100.00%
 No response117
 
Department or Office N%
0010 1 0.48%
1000 8 3.81%
1002 1 0.48%
1012 39 18.57%
1020 64 30.48%
1030 13 6.19%
1040 17 8.10%
1050 13 6.19%
1060 9 4.29%
1070 5 2.38%
2000 8 3.81%
2020 1 0.48%
2030 14 6.67%
2040 16 7.62%
2049 1 0.48%
 Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Scales: In Order of Importance
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Scales Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
Concern for the Individual 6.58    5.65 / 0.88  0.93  6.62    5.71 / 0.90  0.91  -0.06   
Recruitment and Financial Aid 6.55    5.49 / 1.12  1.06  6.55    5.14 / 1.13  1.41  0.35***
Instructional Effectiveness 6.52    5.62 / 0.78  0.90  6.54    5.60 / 0.82  0.94  0.02   
Campus Climate 6.46    5.68 / 0.74  0.78  6.51    5.54 / 0.84  0.97  0.14*  
Academic Advising 6.45    5.47 / 0.94  0.98  6.47    5.55 / 0.92  0.92  -0.08   
Student Centeredness 6.41    5.83 / 0.79  0.58  6.48    5.69 / 0.92  0.79  0.14*  
Safety and Security 6.36    5.15 / 1.00  1.21  6.32    5.00 / 1.18  1.32  0.15   
Campus Support Services 6.35    5.52 / 1.03  0.83  6.36    5.13 / 1.11  1.23  0.39***
Service Excellence 6.35    5.61 / 0.94  0.74  6.41    5.31 / 1.04  1.10  0.30***
Registration Effectiveness 6.17    5.35 / 1.03  0.82  6.24    5.28 / 1.02  0.96  0.07   
Campus Life 6.04    5.07 / 1.21  0.97  6.12    5.11 / 1.18  1.01  -0.04   
Responsiveness to Diverse Populations     5.26 / 1.20         5.02 / 1.26     0.24** 

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Items: In Order of Importance
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Items Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
6. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 6.78    5.59 / 1.18  1.19  6.72    5.49 / 1.32  1.23  0.10   
27. Students are able to experience intellectual growth here. 6.70    6.02 / 0.96  0.68  6.63    5.85 / 1.10  0.78  0.17*  
1. The campus staff are caring and helpful. 6.68    5.91 / 1.17  0.77  6.69    5.79 / 1.09  0.90  0.12   
4. Financial aid counselors are helpful. 6.68    5.44 / 1.40  1.24  6.65    5.21 / 1.45  1.44  0.23   
12. The instruction in major fields is excellent. 6.68    5.55 / 1.14  1.13  6.69    5.62 / 1.14  1.07  -0.07   
46. Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their field. 6.68    5.99 / 0.91  0.69  6.72    6.05 / 0.99  0.67  -0.06   
28. There is a commitment to academic excellence on this campus. 6.67    5.73 / 1.31  0.94  6.68    5.60 / 1.35  1.08  0.13   
2. Faculty care about students as individuals. 6.65    5.76 / 1.03  0.89  6.70    5.88 / 1.01  0.82  -0.12   
7. The content of the courses within each major is valuable. 6.65    5.61 / 0.99  1.04  6.64    5.61 / 1.09  1.03  0.00   
5. Academic advisors are approachable. 6.64    5.42 / 1.21  1.22  6.61    5.59 / 1.14  1.02  -0.17*  
18. Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 6.63    5.57 / 1.15  1.06  6.66    5.53 / 1.20  1.13  0.04   
25. Security staff respond quickly in emergencies. 6.63    5.62 / 1.40  1.01  6.62    5.28 / 1.52  1.34  0.34** 
3. Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 6.62    5.77 / 1.21  0.85  6.62    5.41 / 1.29  1.21  0.36***
39. The quality of instruction students receive in most of their classes is excellent. 6.62    5.64 / 1.03  0.98  6.67    5.64 / 1.14  1.03  0.00   
10. Financial aid awards are announced to students in time to be helpful in college planning. 6.56    5.39 / 1.39  1.17  6.54    4.85 / 1.55  1.69  0.54***
22. Academic advisors are knowledgeable about requirements for majors within their area. 6.56    5.64 / 1.13  0.92  6.62    5.63 / 1.18  0.99  0.01   
45. Tuition paid is a worthwhile investment. 6.56    5.77 / 1.19  0.79  6.58    5.75 / 1.21  0.83  0.02   
11. Academic advisors are concerned about students' success as individuals. 6.53    5.37 / 1.19  1.16  6.53    5.62 / 1.13  0.91  -0.25** 
14. Library resources and services are adequate. 6.53    5.62 / 1.44  0.91  6.46    5.02 / 1.61  1.44  0.60***
40. This institution shows concern for students as individuals. 6.50    5.86 / 1.02  0.64  6.57    5.80 / 1.17  0.77  0.06   
32. Admissions counselors accurately portray the campus in their recruiting practices. 6.48    5.52 / 1.38  0.96  6.49    5.19 / 1.46  1.30  0.33** 
30. Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 6.45    6.10 / 0.83  0.35  6.58    5.89 / 1.10  0.69  0.21** 
37. Major requirements are clear and reasonable. 6.45    5.83 / 1.01  0.62  6.49    5.80 / 1.06  0.69  0.03   
41. Adjunct faculty are competent as classroom instructors. 6.45    5.30 / 1.35  1.15  6.44    5.28 / 1.30  1.16  0.02   
35. This institution has a good reputation within the community. 6.43    5.90 / 1.20  0.53  6.47    5.72 / 1.32  0.75  0.18*  
19. Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 6.40    5.93 / 1.12  0.47  6.41    5.18 / 1.50  1.23  0.75***
13. Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 6.39    5.26 / 1.42  1.13  6.44    4.93 / 1.49  1.51  0.33** 
47. There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus. 6.38    5.51 / 1.25  0.87  6.37    5.42 / 1.34  0.95  0.09   
29. Academic support services adequately meet the needs of students. 6.37    5.56 / 1.16  0.81  6.38    5.30 / 1.29  1.08  0.26** 
31. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress in their courses. 6.35    5.57 / 1.05  0.78  6.38    5.44 / 1.12  0.94  0.13   
44. Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours. 6.35    5.45 / 1.30  0.90  6.34    5.59 / 1.23  0.75  -0.14   
21. Parking lots are well-lighted and secure. 6.34    5.77 / 1.08  0.57  6.32    5.01 / 1.58  1.31  0.76***
42. There is a strong commitment to racial harmony on this campus. 6.33    5.39 / 1.29  0.94  6.39    5.40 / 1.39  0.99  -0.01   
23. Students are able to register for classes they need with few conflicts. 6.32    4.40 / 1.65  1.92  6.29    4.71 / 1.49  1.58  -0.31** 
38. Students seldom get the "run-around" when seeking information on this campus. 6.31    5.16 / 1.46  1.15  6.37    4.60 / 1.59  1.77  0.56***
49. On the whole, the campus is well-maintained. 6.28    6.18 / 1.03  0.10  6.32    5.58 / 1.46  0.74  0.60***
20. The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 6.24    5.84 / 1.03  0.40  6.37    5.60 / 1.23  0.77  0.24*  
43. Student disciplinary procedures are fair. 6.24    5.41 / 1.52  0.83  6.37    5.45 / 1.36  0.92  -0.04   
69. Academic reputation as factor in decision to enroll. 6.22        5.82            
68. Financial aid as factor in decision to enroll. 6.21        6.27            
17. Living conditions in the residence halls are comfortable. 6.15    4.93 / 1.36  1.22  6.20    4.84 / 1.51  1.36  0.09   
48. Channels for expressing student complaints are readily available. 6.15    5.47 / 1.23  0.68  6.21    5.21 / 1.42  1.00  0.26*  
9. Billing policies are reasonable. 6.14    5.40 / 1.06  0.74  6.27    5.03 / 1.38  1.24  0.37** 
75. Personalized attention prior to enrollment as factor in decision to enroll. 6.14        6.00            
24. The assessment and course placement procedures are reasonable. 6.09    5.22 / 1.19  0.87  6.09    5.16 / 1.24  0.93  0.06   
33. There are adequate services to help students decide upon a career. 6.09    4.87 / 1.59  1.22  6.19    5.03 / 1.47  1.16  -0.16   
50. Student activities fees are put to good use. 6.06    5.13 / 1.43  0.93  6.06    5.04 / 1.43  1.02  0.09   
15. Academic advisors help students set goals to work toward. 6.05    5.08 / 1.24  0.97  6.10    5.06 / 1.26  1.04  0.02   
8. Administrators are approachable to students. 6.00    5.43 / 1.19  0.57  6.09    5.25 / 1.34  0.84  0.18   
67. Cost as factor in decision to enroll. 5.97        5.89            
34. Class change (drop/add) policies are reasonable. 5.96    5.82 / 1.20  0.14  6.02    5.71 / 1.15  0.31  0.11   
36. Faculty take into consideration student differences as they teach their courses. 5.96    5.18 / 1.25  0.78  6.11    5.21 / 1.23  0.90  -0.03   
70. Size of institution as factor in decision to enroll. 5.85        5.57            
73. Geographic setting as factor in decision to enroll. 5.81        5.29            
26. There is an adequate selection of food available in the cafeteria. 5.74    4.85 / 1.53  0.89  5.86    5.11 / 1.64  0.75  -0.26*  
16. The amount of student parking space on campus is adequate. 5.67    3.64 / 1.94  2.03  5.63    4.25 / 1.94  1.38  -0.61***
72. Recommendations from family/friends as factor in decision to enroll. 5.55        5.70            
74. Campus appearance as factor in decision to enroll. 5.51        5.20            
71. Opportunity to play sports as factor in decision to enroll. 2.95        4.22            
61. Institution's commitment to part-time students?     5.21 / 1.46         5.15 / 1.45     0.06   
62. Institution's commitment to evening students?     5.22 / 1.57         4.85 / 1.72     0.37** 
63. Institution's commitment to older, returning learners?     5.14 / 1.59         5.16 / 1.52     -0.02   
64. Institution's commitment to under-represented populations?     5.22 / 1.40         4.93 / 1.55     0.29*  
65. Institution's commitment to commuters?     5.24 / 1.44         5.15 / 1.42     0.09   
66. Institution's commitment to students with disabilities?     5.51 / 1.21         4.89 / 1.62     0.62***

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Student Centeredness
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
1. The campus staff are caring and helpful. 6.68    5.91 / 1.17  0.77  6.69    5.79 / 1.09  0.90  0.12   
8. Administrators are approachable to students. 6.00    5.43 / 1.19  0.57  6.09    5.25 / 1.34  0.84  0.18   
30. Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 6.45    6.10 / 0.83  0.35  6.58    5.89 / 1.10  0.69  0.21** 
40. This institution shows concern for students as individuals. 6.50    5.86 / 1.02  0.64  6.57    5.80 / 1.17  0.77  0.06   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Campus Life
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
17. Living conditions in the residence halls are comfortable. 6.15    4.93 / 1.36  1.22  6.20    4.84 / 1.51  1.36  0.09   
26. There is an adequate selection of food available in the cafeteria. 5.74    4.85 / 1.53  0.89  5.86    5.11 / 1.64  0.75  -0.26*  
43. Student disciplinary procedures are fair. 6.24    5.41 / 1.52  0.83  6.37    5.45 / 1.36  0.92  -0.04   
50. Student activities fees are put to good use. 6.06    5.13 / 1.43  0.93  6.06    5.04 / 1.43  1.02  0.09   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Instructional Effectiveness
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
2. Faculty care about students as individuals. 6.65    5.76 / 1.03  0.89  6.70    5.88 / 1.01  0.82  -0.12   
7. The content of the courses within each major is valuable. 6.65    5.61 / 0.99  1.04  6.64    5.61 / 1.09  1.03  0.00   
12. The instruction in major fields is excellent. 6.68    5.55 / 1.14  1.13  6.69    5.62 / 1.14  1.07  -0.07   
18. Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 6.63    5.57 / 1.15  1.06  6.66    5.53 / 1.20  1.13  0.04   
27. Students are able to experience intellectual growth here. 6.70    6.02 / 0.96  0.68  6.63    5.85 / 1.10  0.78  0.17*  
28. There is a commitment to academic excellence on this campus. 6.67    5.73 / 1.31  0.94  6.68    5.60 / 1.35  1.08  0.13   
31. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress in their courses. 6.35    5.57 / 1.05  0.78  6.38    5.44 / 1.12  0.94  0.13   
36. Faculty take into consideration student differences as they teach their courses. 5.96    5.18 / 1.25  0.78  6.11    5.21 / 1.23  0.90  -0.03   
39. The quality of instruction students receive in most of their classes is excellent. 6.62    5.64 / 1.03  0.98  6.67    5.64 / 1.14  1.03  0.00   
41. Adjunct faculty are competent as classroom instructors. 6.45    5.30 / 1.35  1.15  6.44    5.28 / 1.30  1.16  0.02   
44. Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours. 6.35    5.45 / 1.30  0.90  6.34    5.59 / 1.23  0.75  -0.14   
46. Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their field. 6.68    5.99 / 0.91  0.69  6.72    6.05 / 0.99  0.67  -0.06   
47. There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus. 6.38    5.51 / 1.25  0.87  6.37    5.42 / 1.34  0.95  0.09   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Recruitment and Financial Aid
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
3. Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 6.62    5.77 / 1.21  0.85  6.62    5.41 / 1.29  1.21  0.36***
4. Financial aid counselors are helpful. 6.68    5.44 / 1.40  1.24  6.65    5.21 / 1.45  1.44  0.23   
10. Financial aid awards are announced to students in time to be helpful in college planning. 6.56    5.39 / 1.39  1.17  6.54    4.85 / 1.55  1.69  0.54***
13. Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 6.39    5.26 / 1.42  1.13  6.44    4.93 / 1.49  1.51  0.33** 
32. Admissions counselors accurately portray the campus in their recruiting practices. 6.48    5.52 / 1.38  0.96  6.49    5.19 / 1.46  1.30  0.33** 

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Campus Support Services
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
14. Library resources and services are adequate. 6.53    5.62 / 1.44  0.91  6.46    5.02 / 1.61  1.44  0.60***
19. Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 6.40    5.93 / 1.12  0.47  6.41    5.18 / 1.50  1.23  0.75***
29. Academic support services adequately meet the needs of students. 6.37    5.56 / 1.16  0.81  6.38    5.30 / 1.29  1.08  0.26** 
33. There are adequate services to help students decide upon a career. 6.09    4.87 / 1.59  1.22  6.19    5.03 / 1.47  1.16  -0.16   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Academic Advising
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
5. Academic advisors are approachable. 6.64    5.42 / 1.21  1.22  6.61    5.59 / 1.14  1.02  -0.17*  
11. Academic advisors are concerned about students' success as individuals. 6.53    5.37 / 1.19  1.16  6.53    5.62 / 1.13  0.91  -0.25** 
15. Academic advisors help students set goals to work toward. 6.05    5.08 / 1.24  0.97  6.10    5.06 / 1.26  1.04  0.02   
22. Academic advisors are knowledgeable about requirements for majors within their area. 6.56    5.64 / 1.13  0.92  6.62    5.63 / 1.18  0.99  0.01   
37. Major requirements are clear and reasonable. 6.45    5.83 / 1.01  0.62  6.49    5.80 / 1.06  0.69  0.03   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Registration Effectiveness
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
9. Billing policies are reasonable. 6.14    5.40 / 1.06  0.74  6.27    5.03 / 1.38  1.24  0.37** 
20. The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 6.24    5.84 / 1.03  0.40  6.37    5.60 / 1.23  0.77  0.24*  
23. Students are able to register for classes they need with few conflicts. 6.32    4.40 / 1.65  1.92  6.29    4.71 / 1.49  1.58  -0.31** 
34. Class change (drop/add) policies are reasonable. 5.96    5.82 / 1.20  0.14  6.02    5.71 / 1.15  0.31  0.11   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Safety and Security
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
6. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 6.78    5.59 / 1.18  1.19  6.72    5.49 / 1.32  1.23  0.10   
16. The amount of student parking space on campus is adequate. 5.67    3.64 / 1.94  2.03  5.63    4.25 / 1.94  1.38  -0.61***
21. Parking lots are well-lighted and secure. 6.34    5.77 / 1.08  0.57  6.32    5.01 / 1.58  1.31  0.76***
25. Security staff respond quickly in emergencies. 6.63    5.62 / 1.40  1.01  6.62    5.28 / 1.52  1.34  0.34** 

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Concern for the Individual
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
2. Faculty care about students as individuals. 6.65    5.76 / 1.03  0.89  6.70    5.88 / 1.01  0.82  -0.12   
11. Academic advisors are concerned about students' success as individuals. 6.53    5.37 / 1.19  1.16  6.53    5.62 / 1.13  0.91  -0.25** 
18. Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 6.63    5.57 / 1.15  1.06  6.66    5.53 / 1.20  1.13  0.04   
40. This institution shows concern for students as individuals. 6.50    5.86 / 1.02  0.64  6.57    5.80 / 1.17  0.77  0.06   

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Service Excellence
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
1. The campus staff are caring and helpful. 6.68    5.91 / 1.17  0.77  6.69    5.79 / 1.09  0.90  0.12   
20. The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 6.24    5.84 / 1.03  0.40  6.37    5.60 / 1.23  0.77  0.24*  
38. Students seldom get the "run-around" when seeking information on this campus. 6.31    5.16 / 1.46  1.15  6.37    4.60 / 1.59  1.77  0.56***
48. Channels for expressing student complaints are readily available. 6.15    5.47 / 1.23  0.68  6.21    5.21 / 1.42  1.00  0.26*  

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Responsiveness to Diverse Populations
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
61. Institution's commitment to part-time students?     5.21 / 1.46         5.15 / 1.45     0.06   
62. Institution's commitment to evening students?     5.22 / 1.57         4.85 / 1.72     0.37** 
63. Institution's commitment to older, returning learners?     5.14 / 1.59         5.16 / 1.52     -0.02   
64. Institution's commitment to under-represented populations?     5.22 / 1.40         4.93 / 1.55     0.29*  
65. Institution's commitment to commuters?     5.24 / 1.44         5.15 / 1.42     0.09   
66. Institution's commitment to students with disabilities?     5.51 / 1.21         4.89 / 1.62     0.62***

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Campus Climate
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Item Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
1. The campus staff are caring and helpful. 6.68    5.91 / 1.17  0.77  6.69    5.79 / 1.09  0.90  0.12   
2. Faculty care about students as individuals. 6.65    5.76 / 1.03  0.89  6.70    5.88 / 1.01  0.82  -0.12   
6. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 6.78    5.59 / 1.18  1.19  6.72    5.49 / 1.32  1.23  0.10   
8. Administrators are approachable to students. 6.00    5.43 / 1.19  0.57  6.09    5.25 / 1.34  0.84  0.18   
28. There is a commitment to academic excellence on this campus. 6.67    5.73 / 1.31  0.94  6.68    5.60 / 1.35  1.08  0.13   
30. Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 6.45    6.10 / 0.83  0.35  6.58    5.89 / 1.10  0.69  0.21** 
35. This institution has a good reputation within the community. 6.43    5.90 / 1.20  0.53  6.47    5.72 / 1.32  0.75  0.18*  
38. Students seldom get the "run-around" when seeking information on this campus. 6.31    5.16 / 1.46  1.15  6.37    4.60 / 1.59  1.77  0.56***
40. This institution shows concern for students as individuals. 6.50    5.86 / 1.02  0.64  6.57    5.80 / 1.17  0.77  0.06   
42. There is a strong commitment to racial harmony on this campus. 6.33    5.39 / 1.29  0.94  6.39    5.40 / 1.39  0.99  -0.01   
45. Tuition paid is a worthwhile investment. 6.56    5.77 / 1.19  0.79  6.58    5.75 / 1.21  0.83  0.02   
48. Channels for expressing student complaints are readily available. 6.15    5.47 / 1.23  0.68  6.21    5.21 / 1.42  1.00  0.26*  

 

Copyright 2001, USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Survey Results
Loyola University New Orleans - 6/2002 Institutional Priorities Survey, 4-Year College

Institutional Summary
Items: In Sequential Order
Loyola University New Orleans 4-Year Private Institutions (IPS)
Items Import Agree / SD Gap Import Agree / SD Gap Mean
Difference
1. The campus staff are caring and helpful. 6.68    5.91 / 1.17  0.77  6.69    5.79 / 1.09  0.90  0.12   
2. Faculty care about students as individuals. 6.65    5.76 / 1.03  0.89  6.70    5.88 / 1.01  0.82  -0.12   
3. Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 6.62    5.77 / 1.21  0.85  6.62    5.41 / 1.29  1.21  0.36***
4. Financial aid counselors are helpful. 6.68    5.44 / 1.40  1.24  6.65    5.21 / 1.45  1.44  0.23   
5. Academic advisors are approachable. 6.64    5.42 / 1.21  1.22  6.61    5.59 / 1.14  1.02  -0.17*  
6. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 6.78    5.59 / 1.18  1.19  6.72    5.49 / 1.32  1.23  0.10   
7. The content of the courses within each major is valuable. 6.65    5.61 / 0.99  1.04  6.64    5.61 / 1.09  1.03  0.00   
8. Administrators are approachable to students. 6.00    5.43 / 1.19  0.57  6.09    5.25 / 1.34  0.84  0.18   
9. Billing policies are reasonable. 6.14    5.40 / 1.06  0.74  6.27    5.03 / 1.38  1.24  0.37** 
10. Financial aid awards are announced to students in time to be helpful in college planning. 6.56    5.39 / 1.39  1.17  6.54    4.85 / 1.55  1.69  0.54***
11. Academic advisors are concerned about students' success as individuals. 6.53    5.37 / 1.19  1.16  6.53    5.62 / 1.13  0.91  -0.25** 
12. The instruction in major fields is excellent. 6.68    5.55 / 1.14  1.13  6.69    5.62 / 1.14  1.07  -0.07   
13. Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 6.39    5.26 / 1.42  1.13  6.44    4.93 / 1.49  1.51  0.33** 
14. Library resources and services are adequate. 6.53    5.62 / 1.44  0.91  6.46    5.02 / 1.61  1.44  0.60***
15. Academic advisors help students set goals to work toward. 6.05    5.08 / 1.24  0.97  6.10    5.06 / 1.26  1.04  0.02   
16. The amount of student parking space on campus is adequate. 5.67    3.64 / 1.94  2.03  5.63    4.25 / 1.94  1.38  -0.61***
17. Living conditions in the residence halls are comfortable. 6.15    4.93 / 1.36  1.22  6.20    4.84 / 1.51  1.36  0.09   
18. Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 6.63    5.57 / 1.15  1.06  6.66    5.53 / 1.20  1.13  0.04   
19. Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 6.40    5.93 / 1.12  0.47  6.41    5.18 / 1.50  1.23  0.75***
20. The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 6.24    5.84 / 1.03  0.40  6.37    5.60 / 1.23  0.77  0.24*  
21. Parking lots are well-lighted and secure. 6.34    5.77 / 1.08  0.57  6.32    5.01 / 1.58  1.31  0.76***
22. Academic advisors are knowledgeable about requirements for majors within their area. 6.56    5.64 / 1.13  0.92  6.62    5.63 / 1.18  0.99  0.01   
23. Students are able to register for classes they need with few conflicts. 6.32    4.40 / 1.65  1.92  6.29    4.71 / 1.49  1.58  -0.31** 
24. The assessment and course placement procedures are reasonable. 6.09    5.22 / 1.19  0.87  6.09    5.16 / 1.24  0.93  0.06   
25. Security staff respond quickly in emergencies. 6.63    5.62 / 1.40  1.01  6.62    5.28 / 1.52  1.34  0.34** 
26. There is an adequate selection of food available in the cafeteria. 5.74    4.85 / 1.53  0.89  5.86    5.11 / 1.64  0.75  -0.26*  
27. Students are able to experience intellectual growth here. 6.70    6.02 / 0.96  0.68  6.63    5.85 / 1.10  0.78  0.17*  
28. There is a commitment to academic excellence on this campus. 6.67    5.73 / 1.31  0.94  6.68    5.60 / 1.35  1.08  0.13   
29. Academic support services adequately meet the needs of students. 6.37    5.56 / 1.16  0.81  6.38    5.30 / 1.29  1.08  0.26** 
30. Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 6.45    6.10 / 0.83  0.35  6.58    5.89 / 1.10  0.69  0.21** 
31. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress in their courses. 6.35    5.57 / 1.05  0.78  6.38    5.44 / 1.12  0.94  0.13   
32. Admissions counselors accurately portray the campus in their recruiting practices. 6.48    5.52 / 1.38  0.96  6.49    5.19 / 1.46  1.30  0.33** 
33. There are adequate services to help students decide upon a career. 6.09    4.87 / 1.59  1.22  6.19    5.03 / 1.47  1.16  -0.16   
34. Class change (drop/add) policies are reasonable. 5.96    5.82 / 1.20  0.14  6.02    5.71 / 1.15  0.31  0.11   
35. This institution has a good reputation within the community. 6.43    5.90 / 1.20  0.53  6.47    5.72 / 1.32  0.75  0.18*  
36. Faculty take into consideration student differences as they teach their courses. 5.96    5.18 / 1.25  0.78  6.11    5.21 / 1.23  0.90  -0.03   
37. Major requirements are clear and reasonable. 6.45    5.83 / 1.01  0.62  6.49    5.80 / 1.06  0.69  0.03   
38. Students seldom get the "run-around" when seeking information on this campus. 6.31    5.16 / 1.46  1.15  6.37    4.60 / 1.59  1.77  0.56***
39. The quality of instruction students receive in most of their classes is excellent. 6.62    5.64 / 1.03  0.98  6.67    5.64 / 1.14  1.03  0.00   
40. This institution shows concern for students as individuals. 6.50    5.86 / 1.02  0.64  6.57    5.80 / 1.17  0.77  0.06   
41. Adjunct faculty are competent as classroom instructors.