|
Ecology of the Mississippi River Delta Region
CONTROLLING THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
HISTORY OF THE OLD RIVER AREA.
As mentioned earlier, the Atchafalaya River is a distributary of the Mississippi, but it has not always been this way. The two rivers have an interesting
history that includes people trying to merge the two. Let's take a look at their area of contact, called the Old River Area since, as we will see, one of the
early links was called Old River.
- BEFORE THE 15th CENTURY: The Red River (RR) and Mississippi River (MR) were separate rivers, more or less parallel
(illustration A on the adjacent figure "Illustrations for Historical Development
of ORCS”).
- 15th CENTURY: The MR turned west and a loop, later called Turnbull's Bend, formed. It intercepted the RR, which became
a tributary of the MR and the Atchafalaya River (AR) was formed as a distributary of the MR.
 
- BY 1778: The entrance to AR was occluded by a log jam.
- 1831: Capt. Henry M. Shreve, founder of Shreveport and a world renowned river engineer, dug a canal through the neck
of Turnbull's Bend, thus shortening river travel time.
- Over time, the north section of Turnbull's Bend filled in with sediment. The lower half remained open and became known as Old River
(OR) and linked the three rivers.
 
- 1839: Locals burned the 30 mi long log jam of the AR to the level of the water surface. In 1840, the state removed the rest.
Periodic clearing efforts were required until the 1860s.
- As time passed, AR became deeper and wider and began to capture more of the MR. During high water in the MR, water flowed west in
OR and down AR. When RR was high and MR low, water flowed down AR and east through OR.
- 1880: AR was now large enough that there was only occasional eastward flow. AR continued to grow and capture more of the MR.
- 1953: By the late 1940s, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concluded that MR could change
course to the AR bed by 1990 if it were not controlled. This observation came from studies that monitored latitude flow
over the years.
Percentage of Latitude Flow Entering the Atchafalaya River
1850-1950
| Year | Percentage |
| 1850 | < 10.0 |
| 1900 | 13.0 |
| 1920 | 18.1 |
| 1940 | 23.3 |
| 1950 | 30.0 |
The decision was made to control the river so that year-round 70% of
latitude flow would proceed down the Mississippi River and 30% down the Atchafalaya.

- 1963: The Old River Control Project was completed





New channels dug include the outflow channel and the navigation channel, the latter having a lock to allow for the passage
of shipping. The following table shows that the old river control structure is working as designed.
Percentage of Latitude Flow Entering the Atchafalaya River 1973-1985
| Year | Percentage |
| 1973 | 34.6 |
| 1974 | 34.7 |
| 1975 | 34.9 |
| 1976 | 31.8 (Partial control restored) |
| 1977-1985 | 30.0 (Full control) |
- 1973: A large flood partially undermined the Low Sill Structure. If it had failed, the MR probably have shifted to AR and
possibly not been able to be shifted back.
Flood of 1973 showing flooded overbank structure.
Lowsill structure showing collapsed wing wall.
Potential scouring beneath the low sill structure. Had this happened, the structure may have collapsed. In fact, deep
pits were scoured on each side, but did not unite underneath.
Repair done to prevent future scouring.
- 1985: Construction begins on Sidney A. Murray, Jr. Hydroelectric Plant. It is situated just north of the Low Sill Structure with
affluent from the Mississippi River and effluent to the Outflow Channel.

- 1986: The Auxiliary Structure (see slide above) with its new channel opened to relieve pressure at other sites.

One of the reasons that people suggested that the Atchafalaya would eventually “capture” (that is, the main flow of water through our state would exit
Morgan City instead of its present location at the mouth of the Mississippi) is that the distance is so much shorter and steeper to the Gulf via the Atchafalaya than
the meandering Mississippi:
ORCS to Gulf via Atchafalaya: 142 mi
ORCS to Gulf via Mississippi: 335 mi
If the events of 1973, as described above, happened, how would life on the lower Mississippi and Louisiana coast change? Would the present-day
Mississippi River suddenly dry up? Would a fisherman sitting by the river see it go “glub, glub, glub,” with fish flopping around in the mud? Would shipping
stop on the river? Would there be any impact at all? The following description of possible life after the change is excerpted from Kazmann and Johnson
(1980:10-16).
In the aftermath of the huge floods that would cause the main flow of the river to jump to the Atchafalaya River, aside from the cost, anxiety, tragedy, and
aggravation of dealing with massive amounts of water being in the wrong place, there would be lingering issues that would change the way of life on the
lower Mississippi. Instead of 70% flow down the lower Mississippi and 30% flow down the Atchafalaya, the percentages would probably reverse. The
Atchafalaya would be a rushing, raging river, even during the fall for a period of time until it scoured the channel and filled in the lower reaches so that the
flow would diminish. Morgan City would have to be relocated, as would other communities and many businesses, possibly including the massive infrastructure
of the offshore oil and gas industry. Fisheries would be altered measurably all across the delta. Oyster reefs would be immediately destroyed, and would take
several years to reestablish and become productive (no erysters!). It would probably take two decades to adapt to the new environment around present day
Morgan City. Additionally, pipelines, bridges, and the like that cross the Atchafalaya would be destroyed or rendered unsafe. The ruptured natural gas pipelines
would place stress on fuel supplies for energy companies, but they would quickly change to more costly fuel sources and have little or no interruption of service.
Imagine the traffic jams when and if bridges on I-10, U.S. 90, and U.S. 190 collapse (what about the railroads)? All trans-state traffic would have to be rerouted to
I-20 via I-55 through Jackson, Mississippi, adding up to 615 miles to the trip (not to mention time delays from the traffic jams). The protective levees of the
Atchafalaya Basin would have to be upgraded to handle the new pressure from Spring flows. And, oh my gosh, think of the negative impact on the crawfish
supply!
The lower Mississippi would still have a copious amount of water, but it would be slack compared to today. Shipping could continue to be an important industry,
but it would be interrupted for a time. The slack water would allow (cause) the thalweg to fill in and stop deep-draft shipping. However, after intensive dredging
efforts it may be found that a 50 ft channel can be easily maintained because of the tremendous decrease in sediment. New Orleans, possibly Baton Rouge, and all
other cities and towns along the lower Mississippi would no longer be able to get their drinking water from the river. It would become too salty, since the lower fresh
water flow would not offset the tidal movement of the Gulf. Can you imagine the cost of piping or trucking enough drinking (and flushing, etc.) water from north of
Lake Pontchartrain to supply the needs of Greater New Orleans? Can you imagine Greater New Orleans without water for drinking and sanitation? Even when the
water was just barely increasing in salinity, there would be severe damage to water heaters, fire sprinklers, fire truck pumping systems, and more. The quality of our
coffee! As mentioned above, the fisheries (especially those associated with the fresh water river) would suddenly change. And what about the massive petrochemical
industry corridor? Aside from the impact on shipping, which they could weather over time, industry could no longer use fresh river water for thermo-electric cooling.
The saltier water would corrode all the pipes and related instrumentation. Of course, industry would change to salt-tolerant materials, but that would be costly and time
consuming. Also, the sugarcane industry would have problems without sufficient fresh water.
All of this adjustment, and we have not delved into the intensity of impact on people’s lives during the crisis and the adjustment period. All normal routines would
stop. Businesses would be closed, as would schools, normal government, etc., etc. Virtually the entire population would spend months and months just coping -
just putting their and others’ lives back together. Imagine the emotional strain to the population - people losing a lifetime of accomplishment. This would be a
tragedy of monumental proportions. It would interrupt life much like World War II.
One can also imagine the impact on the nation. Massive use of Federal dollars to protect and restore Louisiana’s infrastructure. Loss of natural gas
(there would be brown-outs throughout the eastern seaboard). Commerce would be interrupted by restriction of travel and Louisiana’s inability to focus
on supplying items traditionally demanded from her natural resources by the nation. Prices of all Louisiana products (from the natural resources [fisheries, oil, gas]
to industrial products [pvc, polyethelene, etc.]) would soar. The interruption of the pogie fisheries would be very negative for such food industries as chicken,
catfish, and hogs (see the last section of the notes). New Orleans is one of the most important ports in the nation, and it would suddenly cease to function; all
shipping and related industries on the Mississippi River would stop. International trade would be further imbalanced. The massive fertilizer business would shut
down and the agriculture industry would falter.
And what about the economy of south Louisiana? For a period of time, all the revenue would dry up and tourism would collapse. Even Mardi Gras would
possibly come to a halt!!! Only the mosquitoes would do well! And probably the cockroaches and Formosan termites.
Long term, we would adapt. Once the drinking and sanitation water issues were resolved, tourism would return. Coastal erosion could be
reversed on the west side of the present-day Mississippi River. Shrimp, oysters, and other fisheries would probably flourish after a number of years due
to new marshes being produced and nutrient rich sediments being redistributed.
This would obviously place a lot of stress on at least two generations of residents. We would survive, but it would be a new Louisiana and
Mississippi River delta.
What condition might potentially lead to this scenario? Experts predict that the ORCS might fail if the snow fall between
Saskatchewan and New York exceeds that of the winter of 1972-73.
HOW THE FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM WORKS ON THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER.
For ages, the Mississippi River followed a similar pattern year-after-year. As the water began to rise in the spring, the river would leave the depths of
its channel and fill the batture of the natural levee. All backwater areas would slowly fill. When non-native Americans came on the scene, they began to build
levees that protected them from floods during most years. Occasionally, higher water would result in flooding, so the local folks would build the levees higher.
After the great floods of 1927, the public mandated that Congress solve the flooding problems of the lower Mississippi River basin. They did so
by constructing a levee and "relief valve" (spillways and related structures) system that is shown on the adjacent figure
"Mississippi River Flood Control Plan Below Old River."
Each spring, as the water in the river rises, there is a sequence of events that occur that protect the lower river basin from flooding.
- The water begins to pool into a large back swamp area in Avoyelles and Concordia parishes. This area is a vital part of the system because
it holds so much water and gradually drains as the waters recede through the summer months. If they are ever lost (through development), the
lower basin will be in grave danger.
- As the back swamp fills, water rises in the river channel and covers the batture. In the Atchafalaya, this occurs between the internal levees
that are along the margins of the river above the latitude of Baton Rouge, then the water spreads to cover the entire floodway between the guide
levees that extend southward all the way to the Atchafalaya Bay.
- The flow rates of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya increase, but remain in the 70%/30% ratio.
- If the predictive model used by the Corps of Engineers indicates that the above three steps will not prevent flooding, then they go to the
human operated structures:
- Bonnet Carré Flood Control Structure: When the water reaches a critical stage (it was originally designed to keep the
Carrollton Gauge, located at the Corps of Engineers headquarters at the river on River Road, below the 20 ft mark - which kept the
river 5 ft below the top of the levee), this flood control structure is opened to allow up to 250,000 cfs of water to flow into Lake
Pontchartrain through the Bonnet Carré Spillway. It has been operated eight times (1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1997).
- Morganza Control Structure: After the Bonnet Carré Flood Control Structure is opened, and if the river continues to rise to the
next critical stage, this structure is opened. It shunts up to 600,000 cfs into the Atchafalaya River through the Morganza Spillway.
Since this is a very rare occurrence (it has only been opened once, in 1973), the rich soils of the spillway are allowed to be used for
farming, especially for cattle and soy beans. If it has to be used, the lessors are notified and, if they cannot remove their animals and
crops, they lose them when the waters are released through the structures.
- Fuse Plug Levee: If all the above procedures are not enough to handle the flood stage of the river, the last resort is the Fuse
Plug Levee. This is a east-west running levee located between the west guide levee and the west internal levee along the Atchafalaya. To
its north lies the great back swamp area; to its south lies the West Atchafalaya Floodway. It works much like a fuse in your car. The
fuse consists of a piece of wire that will tolerate an electric flow of a certain level (e.g., 15 amps). If a surge of higher electricity hits the fuse,
the wire melts before the surge damages the electronics of the car. The Fuse Plug Levee is lower than the adjacent west guide west internal
levees. If the water in the back swamp is not contained by all the above steps (1-3 & 4a,b), then water begins to flow over the fuse plug
levee rather than over adjacent levees where it would flood human habitations. Once water begins to flow over the top of the Fuse Plug
Levee, it quickly tears it down until it carries a maximum of 250,000 cfs. This is designed to work on its own, but if extremely critical, it
can be dynamited. The Fuse Plug Levee has never been needed.
See the adjacent figure "Project Design Flood" to see a schematic of how the system
is supposed to work. This figure shows the maximum flow that the Corps of Engineers has forecasted. It is called the Project Flood.
WHAT DO CONTROL STRUCTURES LOOK LIKE?
BONNET CARRE SPILLWAY AND ITS CONTROL STRUCTURE IN OPERATION (1983)
Course Document List
|